Works Cited
London, Scott. Democracy - The Myth, The Reality by Wallace Wirths - A Book Review by Scott London. http://www.scottlondon.com/reviews/wirths.html. Jun 28,2005.
Wirths, Wallace R. Democracy - The Myth, The Reality Media Specialists. Sussex, NJ: 1993
Wikipedia Alien and Sedition Acts June 28,2005
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts
Sometimes philosophical, but never completely insane. Calling it like I see it, as I see it. Independent American seeks to illuminate the third side of the issues from an upper-vertical-wing perspective.
Monday, December 19, 2005
What is Democracy All About, Anyway?
Democracy is commonly equated with freedom itself. This is due to a
general lack of understanding about what democracy really is.
"...men have never experienced anything near genuine political
democracy. What we have had are republics, and they have usually
disintegrated into some form of benign, elective monarchy or
oligarchy...a true democracy has never existed and never will exist;
for it is against the natural order of things that the majority
should govern the minority...The `people' have very little power and
certainly in nearly all cases they don't rule.(Wirths)."
Scott London further clarifies:
The framers of the Constitution went to great lengths to establish
the United States as a republic, not as a democracy -- as a
government of laws, not of people. It is very significant, Wirths
notes, that not only is the term "democracy" not mentioned anywhere
in the U.S. Constitution, but the word does not appear in the
constitutions of any of the fifty states.
Given this insight into "democracy," we can see the term for the
rhetorical device it really is. Listen to the Presidental speeches
now and from years past, and hear them for the works of spin that
they are. Democracy, at its core, is a recipe for mob rule,
requiring a simple majority - or the illusion of a majority - to
make critical decisions affecting the lives of all. Intelligent
debate, or mitigating circumstances play no vital role in a
decision's outcome - it doesn't have to. Just ask Sacco and
Vanzetti.
The American perception of democracy is a joke. Consider the fact
that even majority opinion doesn't make things happen. The laws and
policies of the nation are determined by a very small group of
wealthy, priviliged few who attempt to control the minds of the many
through the power of mass media and terror, and when necessary,
enforce their decrees through paramilitary force. It's the real
American way, and has been the case before, during, and after World
War I, right up through today.
The curbing of civil liberties during wartime has a long history in
America, all the way back to the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, to
wit: There were actually four separate laws making up what is
commonly referred to as the "Alien and Sedition Acts":
1. The Alien Enemies Act authorized the president to imprison or
deport any alien associated with any nation the United States was
fighting in a "declared war," during a war time.
2. The Alien Act authorized the president to deport any alien
considered dangerous, even in a peace time.
3. The Naturalization Act extended the duration of residence
required for aliens to become citizens, nearly tripling it from five
years to 14.
4. The Sedition Act made it a crime to publish "false,
scandalous, and malicious writing" against government or government
officials.
With today's "Patriot Act", just as history proved of the Alien and
Sedition Acts, the stated intent does not match the true intent of
the laws. The Acts were ostensibly created to provide national
security, but turned out to be tool of the political party in power,
the Federalist party. Although not directly ruled upon by the High
Court, The Sedition Act was seen as a direct violation of the First
Amendment. In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Court declared
"Although the Sedition Act was never tested in this Court, the
attack upon its validity has carried the day in the court of
history." 376 U.S. 254, 276 (1964).
If there is an America in the future, it will not be proud of the years
2001-2006, which are proving to be closest America has come to destruction in its
history, asthe threat eminates from within. The U.S. cannot justify its pattern of squelching dissenting minorities, as it usually uses the pretense of the national
emergency of the moment to squelch any minority "it" disapproves of.
For example, the current administration, with its Christian backers
who coincidentally have a strong anti-gay bias, has seen fit to
discharge homosexuals from the military for no other reason than
their sexual orientation - even to the detriment of the stated
"national security" agenda, as many have been Arabic translation
experts. Oh, but who needs them when your declared "enemy" is a
group of Islamic fundamentalists?
America had better learn from its history if there is any hope for
it - for us - to continue to exist.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment